How a TruCore and PathNet using digital pathology to change patient care. And if you have any specific stories or outcomes that really highlight the difference you guys are making, because you are making a difference. And let me know about these as well. I want to know how it affects patients and especially like already starting with you, Adam, like driving all around to places that didn’t have pathology services and now taking it into the digital world. Yeah, tell me about what it is, how you do it, and what’s the scale.
Adam: That is a good point. Digital pathology is already saving lives. Because if I was still doing that, the world would be minus one each in epic coal. Like, there’s no way I could have kept doing this. [00:19:00] But, I will say, I’ve been saying, like, to your point, as the population continues to age, and we’re doing more and more biopsies, the number of pathologists continues to dwindle. We’re going to have to find ways to utilize it.
Aleks: Oh, wait, It’s like the coolest, coolest specialty.
Adam: You’re preaching to the choir.
Aleks: Right. And I only talk to pathologists were we are pathologist. But like it’s cool.
Adam: But I’ll tell you a quick story. My, you know, so I was the first physician in the family. And so my grandmother, bless her heart, Catherine Cole up in Chillicothe, Missouri, when she found out her grandson was a doctor, you’ve never seen anybody more proud.
She was bragging to everyone. She is. She told all of her friends at Bingo, at Church Bingo, and like the whole thing, like everybody was excited that her grandson’s gonna be a doctor. And then, the opposite of that, when I, when I showed up and said, yeah grandma, and I think I’m gonna be a pathologist.
You’ve never seen anybody so crestfallen [00:20:00] in your life. She was heartbroken. He was like, I, what am I gonna tell everybody? Like, what do you mean, what are you gonna tell everybody? Just tell them I’m a doctor. Yeah. But right. You, you don’t wanna be a real doctor,
Aleks: But I’m gonna ask what kind of doctor.
Adam: That’s right. I can ask her a doctor with, I was like, no, it’s a real doctor, grandma, you know? But she was crestfallen. She’s like, well wait. Then, then there was like a spark of hope. She was like, well, are you gonna be like Quincy MD? And it’s like, no, I’m not gonna be, I don’t know who Quincy MD is, but it was her TV show on in the 70s where this old pathologist lived on a boat, same as ago, but he would, solve murders.
Aleks: Oh, okay.
Adam: That was gonna be okay, but me just being a regular pathologist, that was so, that was so far from my grandma, but to your point, like, I think it’s a great specialty, and I think it’s becoming more and more exciting, especially with the quality of life, that’s a big, that’s a big initiative for the younger generation, so.
Aleks: You know what, I, I didn’t see it yet, but it, like, kind of, what I did, I’m a veterinary pathologist, [00:21:00] and I, went to vet school and decided, okay, let me work at the like clinician as a vet for a couple of years before I do, further education to my PhD and decide on specialization. And yeah, three years in practice, was enough to send me on the pathology course.
I briefly entertained doing horse medicine, but then I started my, internship at the pathology department and I called the horse clinic and I said, you know what? No, I’m not coming. I’m just staying in the department.
Adam: Those slides never complain. They’re just sitting there ready to be looked at, right? Nobody’s, nobody’s getting a biopsy because they want a work note or anything. Like, they’re actually worried about something if they’re getting a biopsy, but. You know, to the point being. I lost my father to bladder cancer a little over 10 years ago. And so, we’ve all, like Vasco’s big on, you know, pointing this out. If you haven’t, you know, you personally have not been touched by cancer, [00:22:00] you can just guarantee you’ve known someone who has been touched by cancer. So, it’s one of those deals where it’s easy when we’re in our little bubble, you know, and we’re seeing the same thing every day, where it becomes a little bit routine.
But to each one of those patients, right, it’s not just you’re affecting that patient but it has a ripple effect to their family, their friends, like, so you are affecting family when you’re rendering one of these diagnoses and so the days from when they get that biopsy to when they get the report, those are long days.
One of the benefits, I think, of digital pathology that we’re able to harness is we can decrease turnaround times. Obviously, we can look at several cores at a time. We have artificial intelligence, which we can talk about later. But then you can also, a big piece, you know, when we’re digital, we’re not necessarily always going into an office where there’s a congregation of, there’s nine pathologists with power.
We’re not all sitting together in nine, but we have access to all nine all the time. [00:23:00] So when I need another set of eyes, All I have to do is send out a text message to say, Hey, can you guys look into this? You know, like, I’d like to get your opinion on this, this case, and then everybody can kind of login.
We can look at it all in real time and then we can come up with a consensus diagnosis to include, even outside that. We have organizations that are able to log in at the academic centers to take a look. I’ll give you a quick example of where the, the paid dividends. one of my client, we have clients kind of all over the country, but.
Neurologist called me and he goes, Hey man, I’d like to get a second opinion, on this case. Patient would like a second opinion. I said, okay, no problem. Where do you want him set? He said, you know, whether it’s Hopkins or Cleveland, wherever they want it, MD Anderson, doesn’t matter to me. I said, okay, but before you do this, man, just so you know, we’re able to look at these things real, real time.
And the guy goes, oh, that’s good news because the patient is a pathologist. And I’m like, [00:24:00]
Aleks: Oh. He wanted his own second opinion.
Adam: Yeah, so I go, okay. He goes, oh, not only that, his son is a pathologist. Okay? And so I was like, all right, here’s what we do. Send those, the patient, send them my contact info, we’ll get together. I’ll get a Zoom going. And so I was able to Zoom, real time, with him and his son, both pathologists, and go over his wife. And starting at that call, They were determined. He did not want treated. He just wanted to be on active surveillance, by the end of that call, and we were going through all the different features, man. He was ready to get the kitchen sink. He was like, and I was like, do you guys still want a second? He’s like, absolutely not. And the thumb like that, you know, you’re getting treated. He’s like, I know, I know, you know, they’re kind of going back and forth, but they were like, it was. I had not actually seen that, like, digital pathology transform, like, somebody, because it would have taken us weeks, you know, to, to get a second opinion to come back and then they’ve got to talk to the urologist and where to go [00:25:00] and all the different brains.
We had it done that afternoon.
Aleks: That was amazing!
Adam: So, I mean, that’s an in-on, but it happens. I talk to patients quite a bit about going over their slides when they just feel more comfortable talking to the actual pathologist.
Aleks: Yeah. And I’ve heard, this, being done on a routine basis in DermPath. I interviewed, the CEO of pathology watch and this is how they operate. They like the dermatopathologist, the the pathologist, dermatopathologist, evaluates the slides and the dermatologist get them, can show it to the patient on the tablet. So that’s like another level of, like everybody gets their X-rays, right? You, you go walk around with your cd, you’re bringing it to the next, radiologist or whoever is evaluating you.
Nobody does that with pathology slides. Why not? I mean…
Adam: That’s a great point there is, I don’t…
Aleks: We have the, the means right now, especially if you then, like in the US the population is a pretty [00:26:00] mobile population, so you’re like, health record, don’t stay in one place. Even so me, I’m just now going to a different radiologist for, my knee. I just take my cd, right? Because this one is like 20 minutes closer. I don’t wanna wait, I don’t wanna, drive 40 minutes. So this like giving different levels of empowerment and obviously your, story is an extreme case because you were talking to pathologists who, totally understand the tissue, but, this, like empowerment to get a second opinion is something that they think a lot of patients are super intimidated and the process of getting all the materials, even if they are like brave enough and determined to get a second opinion is even more intimidating. So with digital, yeah, go and have a second opinion. Why not? It’s over hell. And keeps, I think it just elevates the standard for everyone. [00:27:00] So digital, makes that possible.
Adam: Well, I think, you know, what’s important to remember, I think exactly what you’re talking about, but to get it, I’m all in favor of more eyes looking at it.
So second opinions, and it used to kind of wrap me around the axle. You know, if we would disagree. Because the natural tendency is to think well, you got a second opinion, so the second opinion guy is right. And that, actually, there’s no studies to back that up. It’s just the most recent opinion. And so everybody’s like, well, it’s the second opinion.
Actually, it’s just another subjective opinion that is being rendered on a very small amount of tissue that’s been sampled. And so to your point, like finding a way to remove what we’re really trying to do is just get to the meat of the question, right? So is it, is it good or is it bad as from a cancer standpoint, where, where are we in between?
So finding ways to insert like purely objective data into that space, I think that’s really where digital pathology is going to outshine what has been the established standard coil. Like it, it honestly doesn’t care, right? [00:28:00] Like it’s operating under the same criteria each time in order to upgrade or downgrade cancer.
Or so I think. I think, honestly, I think that’s going to disrupt the space when it comes to second opinions. At least I’m kind of hopeful. Not that I have anything against second opinions. But I think we can do better. Maybe we get a second opinion that also includes artificial intelligence to interpret and interpretate.
Aleks: Yes, and I can, so I’m going to link to another episode I was talking to Raj Singh from Path Presenter and he, he, he like is super prolific with the Path Presenter software and like every single like area that digital pathology can improve pathology and care. He has an app for this, like, I don’t know how he does that, but he does have an app for second opinion and, and there is a specific episode on that and it’s going to be disrupted.
I, I totally second your, your thought on that. So I assume PathNet helps, do that at scale. Jason, what’s your take on that?
Jason: Absolutely. Yeah.
Aleks: So where do you, geographically, where are your pathologists, serving patients? How widespread are you in the U.S.? Are you also or thinking or outside of the U.S. or?
Jason: Aleks, we’re in about 30 states right now, serving clients in 30 states and, again, to Adam’s point earlier, our clients, or, or, or pathologists can be anywhere. And, you know, assuming, you know, the time zone is not the, you know, is not a hindrance. Other than that, it is real time second opinion collaboration like that, which, is one of the reasons, you know, we have such a, high cancer detect rate, you know, much higher than, than, than the national average. So, yeah, so clients in 30 states.
Aleks: Amazing. So you can, like, set up the, time zones [00:30:00] of your pathologists and strategically send them cases so that you actually, like, can be in operation for, rendering diagnosis 24 hours a day.
Jason: That’s true.
Aleks: And now you’re talking.
Adam: That is the problem with, you know, like, with the digital is that you’ve got a CEO who’s just cracking the whip saying you got to get more of these in and out.
But, I mean, it’s not, If you have, you know, like if you have Wi Fi and you’re in your clear certified space, I mean, there’s really those lines are loaded nonstop all throughout the day and night. So, you know, it’s, it’s nice when you have some down time and you’re like, Hey, I can check in and I can just keep whittling those down, keep knocking those down.
I can get the stains ordered when the stains need to get ordered. So those can get cooking. So, we’re constantly trying to drive that turnaround time down. In particular, we’re ordering molecular as well on behalf of the urologist, because the goal is, you know, like we mentioned before, those are long days. [00:31:00]
If we can get that pathology report back to the clinician so they can talk to the patient, and then ideally, if we’ve started that molecular train as well so that they can get the molecular results back before that patient comes back for their initial post biopsy consultation, that I mean, for a much more robust conversation, you know, it’s one thing to say, bad news, you got cancer.
And let’s be honest, right? That’s the last thing majority of patients are going to hear. And so if, but if you can caveat that with bad news, we’ve got cancer, that being said, we work with our pathologist, they order these molecular tests, and it looks like this is going to be the end of the type of prostate cancer, one that we can just watch.
I’m not terribly worried about that. That’s a totally different conversation versus. Hey, you got cancer. What do you think? We should get one of these molecular? And the patients, most of the time, are like, I don’t know, doc, you know, we should get a molecular. And so, they order it and it takes 30 to 60 days to get that result back.
Man, those are long, that you’re waiting on this molecular. And a lot of times, I shouldn’t say a lot, but 5 [00:32:00] – 10 percent of the time, it’s going to come back and say, quantity not sufficient. There’s not enough tumor RNA present to generate a result. So for 30 days, this poor patient’s…
Aleks: been waiting for nothing…
Adam: Yeah, you know, and now they’re back to square one.
They say, well, what do we do? Oh, I guess we’ll revive you, you know, six to 12 months and see what happens, man. This there’s a better way to skin this cat and I think that’s where digital can really help us.
Aleks: Definitely. And also like, cancer is such a huge, like it encompasses all those entities and in the, like the common sense of this word, it basically is like a death sentence.
And if you can, it’s still like super loaded, I mean, we’re a pathologist or in the pathology space. So, the first thing when somebody tells me, Oh, this and that person had cancer, I’m like, what kind of cancer? But you should not ask that. It’s like an impolite question.
Adam: I do the same thing though.
Aleks: What kind of cancer, right? So I had thyroid cancer [00:33:00] and thyroid cancer is like, it’s not even classified cancer anymore. Like several of these subtypes are not called cancers anymore. Anyway, so that’s my question. But for a patient with a totally, different reality, and if you can be armed with the information that can actually like, lead the conversation into, okay, there are different options than dying. You, you’re gonna be fine. We can watch, we can do whatever. So…
Adam: Absolutely.